The Case for Lobbying Transparency


In response to voters' demands to reduce interest groups' influence over policy-making, many countries have passed or are currently considering implementing transparency regulations on the activities of lobbyists. What is the impact of these laws? To study this question, I add a lobbying stage to a canonical model of political agency. I show that the need for lobbying transparency is rooted in the pandering incentives of politicians rather than in the risk of influence by interest groups. The impact of greater lobbying transparency is null when politicians already behave in the voters' interests. When electoral incentives lead politicians to pander, lobbying helps voters (i) better discipline their politicians by reducing pandering and (ii) ensure the transmission of more truthful information from interest groups. Voters and special interest groups benefit from lobbying transparency regulations. The same need not always hold for politicians. The theoretical framework also has implications for the design of empirical research on this topic.

Click the Cite button above to demo the feature to enable visitors to import publication metadata into their reference management software.
Create your slides in Markdown - click the Slides button to check out the example.

Supplementary notes can be added here, including code, math, and images.

Antoine Zerbini
Antoine Zerbini
PhD student in Political Science

My research interests include Formal Theory, Political Economy and Causal Inference.